APromptRiskDBThreat intelligence atlas
AI Security Technique

Physical Countermeasures - AI Security Technique

Adversaries may acquire or manufacture physical countermeasures to aid or support their attack. These components may be used to disrupt or degrade the model, such as adversarial patterns printed on stickers or T-shirts, disguises, or decoys. They may also be used to disrupt or degrade the sensors used in capturing data, such as laser pointers, light bulbs, or other tools.

View mitigationsRead context
AI Security Techniquedemonstrated

Record summary

A quick snapshot of what this page covers.

Tactics0Attacker goals connected to this method.
Mitigations0Defenses that may help against this attack.
AI risks0Research-backed risks connected to this topic.

Attack context

How this AI attack works in practice.

ATLAS ID
AML.T0008.003
Priority score
30
Maturity: demonstrated

Mitigations

Defenses that may help against this attack.

No connected defenses. No defense is connected to this attack in the current data.

Case studies

Examples from public reports and exercises.

Face Identification System Evasion via Physical Countermeasures

exercise
Date2020-01-01

MITRE's AI Red Team demonstrated a physical-domain evasion attack on a commercial face identification service with the intention of inducing a targeted misclassification. This operation had a combination of traditional MITRE ATT&CK techniques such as finding valid accounts and executing code via an API - all interleaved with adversarial ML specific attacks.

Related risks

Research-backed risks connected to this topic.

No related AI risks. No research risk is connected to this topic in the current data.

Related CVEs

Known software flaws linked to this context.

No related CVEs. No software flaw is connected to this attack in the current data.

Source

Where this page information comes from.