PromptRiskDBThreat intelligence atlas

Physical Environment Access - AI Security Technique

AI Security Technique

In addition to the attacks that take place purely in the digital domain, adversaries may also exploit the physical environment for their attacks. If the model is interacting with data collected from the real world in some way, the adversary can influence the model through access to wherever the data is being collected. By modifying the data in the collection process, the adversary can perform modified versions of...

Overview

A source-backed snapshot of this AI security technique.

In addition to the attacks that take place purely in the digital domain, adversaries may also exploit the physical environment for their attacks. If the model is interacting with data collected from the real world in some way, the adversary can influence the model through access to wherever the data is being collected. By modifying the data in the collection process, the adversary can perform modified versions of attacks designed for digital access.

Tactics1Attacker goals connected to this method.
Mitigations1Defenses that may help against this attack.
AI risks0Research-backed risks connected to this topic.

Technique details

Identifiers, maturity, and source taxonomy for this technique.

ATLAS ID
AML.T0041
Maturity
demonstrated
Priority score
43
ATLAS tactics
AI Model Access

Attack flow

How to read the public records connected to this technique.

1. TechniqueRead the ATLAS description and evidence level.
2. TacticsSee which attacker goals this method supports.
3. ExamplesCheck whether public case studies mention it.
4. DefensesReview safeguards mapped by ATLAS.
5. SourcesOpen the original public records and references.

Impact

Why this technique may deserve attention in the current dataset.

  • Evidence leveldemonstrated
  • Mapped defenses1 ATLAS mitigation records
  • Public examples2 linked case study records
  • Research risks0 related MIT AI Risk records above the confidence threshold
  • Vulnerabilities0 linked CVE records

Mitigations

Defenses that may help against this attack.

AML.M0009 - Use Multi-Modal Sensors

Using a variety of sensors can make it more difficult for an attacker with physical access to compromise and produce malicious results.

LifecycleBusiness and Data Understanding + 2 moreCategoryTechnical - Cyber
B&D UnderstandingData Preparation+1 more

Case studies

Examples from public reports and exercises.

Backdoor Attack on Deep Learning Models in Mobile Apps

Deep learning models are increasingly used in mobile applications as critical components. Researchers from Microsoft Research demonstrated that many deep learning models deployed in mobile apps are vulnerable to backdoor attacks via "neural payload injection." They conducted an empirical study on real-world mobile deep learning apps collected from Google Play. They identified 54 apps that were vulnerable to attack, including popular security and safety critical applications used for cash recognition, parental control, face authentication, and financial services.

Date2021-01-18
exercise

Face Identification System Evasion via Physical Countermeasures

MITRE's AI Red Team demonstrated a physical-domain evasion attack on a commercial face identification service with the intention of inducing a targeted misclassification. This operation had a combination of traditional MITRE ATT&CK techniques such as finding valid accounts and executing code via an API - all interleaved with adversarial ML specific attacks.

Date2020-01-01
exercise

Source evidence

Original public records and references for this page.