PromptRiskDBThreat intelligence atlas
AI Risk

Collectively Harmful Behaviors

"AI systems have the potential to take actions that are seemingly benignin isolation but become problematic in multi-agent or societal contexts. Classical game theory offers simplistic models for understanding these behaviors. For instance, Phelps and Russell (2023) evaluates GPT-3.5's performance in the iterated prisoner's dilemma and other social dilemmas, revealing limitations in themodel's cooperative capabili...

AI Risk7. AI System Safety, Failures, & Limitations7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or values3 - Other

Record summary

A quick snapshot of what this page covers.

Techniques0Attack methods connected to this risk.
Mitigations0Defenses that may help with related attacks.
Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & LimitationsThe broad risk area this belongs to.

Risk profile

How this risk is described and categorized.

"AI systems have the potential to take actions that are seemingly benignin isolation but become problematic in multi-agent or societal contexts. Classical game theory offers simplistic models for understanding these behaviors. For instance, Phelps and Russell (2023) evaluates GPT-3.5's performance in the iterated prisoner's dilemma and other social dilemmas, revealing limitations in themodel's cooperative capabilities."

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & Limitations
Subdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or values
Entity2 - AI
Intent1 - Intentional
Timing3 - Other
CategoryMisaligned Behaviors
SubcategoryCollectively Harmful Behaviors

Suggested mitigations

Defenses that may help with related attacks.

No propagated mitigations. No defense is available through the connected attack methods.

Source

Research source for this risk, when available.