Record summary
A quick snapshot of what this page covers.
Risk profile
How this risk is described and categorized.
"While HP#1 concerns mean or best-case performance, HP#2 concerns worst-case performance: how can we ensure that AI systems will perform safely, and how can we prove this? ML systems have been implemented in high-stakes, safety-critical domains such as driving [182], medicine [113], and warfare [298]. Many more systems have been developed but have remained undeployed or been rolled back as a result of regulatory and safety reasons [471]. Clearly, unsafe systems can result in loss of life, economic damage, and social unrest [407, 10]. Most concerningly, AI systems may be susceptible to so-called “normal accidents” [63], creating cascading errors that are dicult to prevent merely by maintaining a nominal “human in the loop” [122]. Most advanced ML models perform far below the reliability level customary in engineering elds [359]—and because we do not fully understand how cutting-edge systems achieve their results, we cannot yet detect and prevent dangerous modes of operation [285]"
Suggested mitigations
Defenses that may help with related attacks.
Source
Research source for this risk, when available.
Included resource
Ten Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get Right
Original source
MIT AI Risk Repository
Open the public repository used for AI risk records and taxonomy fields.
