PromptRiskDBThreat intelligence atlas

Overreliance

AI Risk

"If a user begins to excessively trust an LLM, this may cause them to develop an overreliance on the LLM. Overreliance can result in automation bias (Kupfer et al., 2023), and can cause errors of omission (user choosing not to verify the validity of a response) and errors of commission (user believing and acting on the basis of the LLM’s response, even if it contradicts their own knowledge) (Skitka et al., 1999)...

Overview

A source-backed snapshot of this AI risk.

"If a user begins to excessively trust an LLM, this may cause them to develop an overreliance on the LLM. Overreliance can result in automation bias (Kupfer et al., 2023), and can cause errors of omission (user choosing not to verify the validity of a response) and errors of commission (user believing and acting on the basis of the LLM’s response, even if it contradicts their own knowledge) (Skitka et al., 1999). It can be particularly dangerous in domains where the user may lack relevant expertise to robustly scrutinize the LLM responses. This is particularly a source of risk for LLMs because LLMs can often generate plausible, yet incorrect or unfaithful, rationalizations of their actions (c.f. Section 3.4.10), which can mistakenly cause the user to develop the belief that LLM has the relevant expertise and has provided a valid response"

Techniques2Attack methods connected to this risk.
Mitigations2Defenses that may help with related attacks.
Records4Source records unified into this concept.

Risk profile

How the MIT AI Risk Repository categorizes this risk.

Domain5. Human-Computer Interaction
Subdomain5.1 > Overreliance and unsafe use
Entity1 - Human
Intent2 - Unintentional
Timing2 - Post-deployment
CategoryLLM-Systems Can Be Untrustworthy; Psychological; Anthropomorphism; Human Autonomy and Intregrity Harms
SubcategoryOverreliance

Merged risk records

Source records unified into this canonical risk concept.

4 recordsView all →

MITRISK-Anwar2024-73.04.03 - Overreliance

"If a user begins to excessively trust an LLM, this may cause them to develop an overreliance on the LLM. Overreliance can result in automation bias (Kupfer et al., 2023), and can cause errors of omission (user choosing not to verify the validity of a response) and errors of commission (user believing and acting on the basis of the LLM’s response, even if it contradicts their own knowledge) (Skitka et al., 1999). It can be particularly dangerous in domains where the user may lack relevant expertise to robustly scrutinize the LLM responses. This is particularly a source of risk for LLMs because LLMs can often generate plausible, yet incorrect or unfaithful, rationalizations of their actions (c.f. Section 3.4.10), which can mistakenly cause the user to develop the belief that LLM has the relevant expertise and has provided a valid response"

Domain5. Human-Computer InteractionSubdomain5.1 > Overreliance and unsafe useSourceFoundational Challenges in Assuring Alignment and Safety of Large Language ModelsYear2024

MITRISK-Abercrombie2024-58.03.07 - Overreliance

"Over-reliance - Unfettered and/or obsessive belief in the accuracy or other quality of a technology system, resulting in addiction, anxiety, introversion, sentience, complacency, lack of critical thinking and other actual or potential negative impacts."

Domain5. Human-Computer InteractionSubdomain5.1 > Overreliance and unsafe useSourceA Collaborative, Human-Centred Taxonomy of AI, Algorithmic, and Automation HarmsYear2024

MITRISK-Gabriel2024-24.05.03 - Overreliance

"Users who have faith in an AI assistant’s emotional and interpersonal abilities may feel empowered to broach topics that are deeply personal and sensitive, such as their mental health concerns. This is the premise for the many proposals to employ conversational AI as a source of emotional support (Meng and Dai, 2021), with suggestions of embedding AI in psychotherapeutic applications beginning to surface (Fiske et al., 2019; see also Chapter 11). However, disclosures related to mental health require a sensitive, and oftentimes professional, approach – an approach that AI can mimic most of the time but may stray from in inopportune moments. If an AI were to respond inappropriately to a sensitive disclosure – by generating false information, for example – the consequences may be grave, especially if the user is in crisis and has no access to other means of support. This consideration also extends to situations in which trusting an inaccurate suggestion is likely to put the user in harm’s way, such as when requesting medical, legal or financial advice from an AI."

Domain5. Human-Computer InteractionSubdomain5.1 > Overreliance and unsafe useSourceThe Ethics of Advanced AI AssistantsYear2024

MITRISK-Weidinger2023-18.05.03 - Overreliance

"Causing people to become emotionally or materially dependent on the model"

Domain5. Human-Computer InteractionSubdomain5.1 > Overreliance and unsafe useSourceSociotechnical Safety Evaluation of Generative AI SystemsYear2023

Mitigations

Defenses that may help with related attacks.

Source evidence

Research source for this risk, when available.