PromptRiskDBThreat intelligence atlas

Specification gaming

AI Risk

Specification gaming is an AI risk in 7. AI System Safety, Failures, & Limitations focused on 7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or...

Overview

A source-backed snapshot of this AI risk.

Techniques0Attack methods connected to this risk.
Mitigations0Defenses that may help with related attacks.
Records4Source records unified into this concept.

Risk profile

How the MIT AI Risk Repository categorizes this risk.

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & Limitations
Subdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or values
Entity2 - AI
Intent1 - Intentional; 3 - Other
Timing3 - Other; 1 - Pre-deployment; 2 - Post-deployment
CategoryAlignment failures in existing ML systems; Goal-related failures; Agency (Goal-Directedness); Harm caused by unaligned competent systems
SubcategorySpecification gaming

Merged risk records

Source records unified into this canonical risk concept.

4 recordsView all →

MITRISK-Maas2023-53.01.02 - Specification gaming

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & LimitationsSubdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or valuesSourceAdvancing AI Governance: A Literature Review of Problems, Options, and ProposalsYear2023

MITRISK-Gabriel2024-24.02.02 - Specification gaming

"Specification gaming (Krakovna et al., 2020) occurs when some faulty feedback is provided to the assistant in the training data (i.e. the training objective O does not fully capture what the user/designer wants the assistant to do). It is typified by the sort of behaviour that exploits loopholes in the task specification to satisfy the literal specification of a goal without achieving the intended outcome."

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & LimitationsSubdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or valuesSourceThe Ethics of Advanced AI AssistantsYear2024

MITRISK-Gipi-kis2024-62.22.01 - Specification gaming

"AI systems can achieve user-specified tasks in undesirable ways unless they are specified carefully and in enough detail. AI systems might find an easier unintended way to accomplish the objective provided by the user or developer, so that the actions by the AI system taken during its execution are very different from what the user expected [75, 191]. This behavior arises not from a problem with the learning algorithm, but rather from the misspecification or underspeci- fication of the intended task, and is generally referred to as specification gaming [43]."

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & LimitationsSubdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or valuesSourceRisk Sources and Risk Management Measures in Support of Standards for General-Purpose AI SystemsYear2024

MITRISK-Leech2024-54.03.01 - Specification gaming

"AI systems game specifications [305]. For example, in 2017 an OpenAI robot trained to grasp a ball via human feedback from a xed viewpoint learned that it was easier to pretend to grasp the ball by placing its hand between the camera and the target object, as this was easier to learn than actually grasping the ball [103]."

Domain7. AI System Safety, Failures, & LimitationsSubdomain7.1 > AI pursuing its own goals in conflict with human goals or valuesSourceTen Hard Problems in Artificial Intelligence We Must Get RightYear2024

Mitigations

Defenses that may help with related attacks.

No propagated mitigations. No defense is available through the connected attack methods.

Source evidence

Research source for this risk, when available.